Can someone explain the differences between ternary operator shorthand (?:) and null coalescing operator (??) in PHP?
When do they behave differently and when in the same way (if that even happens)?
$a ?: $b
VS.
$a ?? $b
When your first argument is null, they're basically the same except that the null coalescing won't output an E_NOTICE when you have an undefined variable. The PHP 7.0 migration docs has this to say:
The null coalescing operator (??) has been added as syntactic sugar for the common case of needing to use a ternary in conjunction with isset(). It returns its first operand if it exists and is not NULL; otherwise it returns its second operand.
Here's some example code to demonstrate this:
<?php
$a = null;
print $a ?? 'b'; // b
print "\n";
print $a ?: 'b'; // b
print "\n";
print $c ?? 'a'; // a
print "\n";
print $c ?: 'a'; // Notice: Undefined variable: c in /in/apAIb on line 14
print "\n";
$b = array('a' => null);
print $b['a'] ?? 'd'; // d
print "\n";
print $b['a'] ?: 'd'; // d
print "\n";
print $b['c'] ?? 'e'; // e
print "\n";
print $b['c'] ?: 'e'; // Notice: Undefined index: c in /in/apAIb on line 33
print "\n";
The lines that have the notice are the ones where I'm using the shorthand ternary operator as opposed to the null coalescing operator. However, even with the notice, PHP will give the same response back.
Execute the code: https://3v4l.org/McavC
Of course, this is always assuming the first argument is null. Once it's no longer null, then you end up with differences in that the ?? operator would always return the first argument while the ?: shorthand would only if the first argument was truthy, and that relies on how PHP would type-cast things to a boolean.
So:
$a = false ?? 'f'; // false
$b = false ?: 'g'; // 'g'
would then have $a be equal to false and $b equal to 'g'.
Collected from the Internet
Please contact [email protected] to delete if infringement.
Comments